Voyeurism and Upskirting

Quick Overview

Voyeurism and Upskirting — Key Facts

Voyeurism under section 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and upskirting under section 67A both require the prosecution to establish a specific intent or purpose. Both carry a maximum of two years' imprisonment and can result in placement on the Sex Offenders Register.

  • Voyeurism — Section 67: It is an offence intentionally to observe or record another person performing a private act without their consent, where the purpose is sexual gratification.
  • Upskirting — Section 67A: Operating equipment or recording images beneath a person's clothing without consent is an offence under the Voyeurism (Offences) Act 2019, regardless of the victim's gender or clothing.
  • The Intent Requirement: The prosecution must prove that the act was done for the purpose of sexual gratification, or to cause humiliation, alarm, or distress. Alternative explanations for the conduct can be relevant to the defence.
  • Sentencing: Both offences carry a maximum of two years' imprisonment and can result in placement on the Sex Offenders Register.
  • Device Seizure: Investigations typically involve the seizure of electronic devices for forensic analysis. This period is an important window for early pre-charge engagement.

Under investigation?

Speak to a specialist criminal defence solicitor immediately. Early legal advice is critical when facing investigation or potential charges.

Speak to a Solicitor Now 0161 383 8855 Get My Free Case Review
"Being investigated does not guarantee a charge. Early intervention is often the difference between a conviction and a dropped case."
Confidential
No obligation
SRA regulated

Voyeurism — Section 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003

Under section 67, voyeurism is committed where a person intentionally observes another person doing a private act without their consent, for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification. A private act is one that a person would reasonably expect to carry out in private — being naked, using a toilet, or engaging in sexual activity. The prosecution must establish that the purpose of the observation or recording was sexual gratification. If the act was motivated by curiosity, a mistake, or a different form of malice, the specific sexual offence of voyeurism may not be made out, although other offences may arise depending on the circumstances.

Upskirting — Section 67A and the Two Offences

The Voyeurism (Offences) Act 2019 inserted section 67A into the Sexual Offences Act 2003 to create two specific criminal offences. Section 67A(1) — operating equipment — covers placing or operating equipment beneath another person's clothing with the intent to view genitals, buttocks, or underwear, or to enable another person to view them. The offence is committed even if no image is actually captured — the intent to view is sufficient. Section 67A(2) — recording an image — is charged where an image beneath a person's clothing has been successfully recorded. The law protects privacy regardless of the victim's gender or what they were wearing.

Challenging Intent — The Motive Battleground

Both voyeurism and upskirting require a specific intent or purpose. For voyeurism, the purpose must be sexual gratification. For upskirting, the purpose must be sexual gratification or the causing of humiliation, alarm, or distress. The absence of the required intent is a complete answer to the charge. Allegations in these cases often arise in crowded settings. Where an image was captured accidentally — for example, by an automatic or unintended camera trigger — or where the positioning of a device can be explained by a reason other than the required intent, these alternative explanations can be developed through digital forensic evidence.

Digital Forensics and Pre-Charge Engagement

Investigations routinely involve the seizure of mobile phones and other devices for forensic examination. Data recovered — including image metadata, timing and sequence of captures, and device location at the time — can be examined by independent experts. Material providing context, such as evidence of accidental or automatic image capture, can be significant to the defence. The period during which devices are being forensically examined — which can extend across several months — is the most important window for early legal engagement and representations to the CPS.

Sentencing and the Sex Offenders Register

Both voyeurism and upskirting carry a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment. Where the court imposes a sentence of imprisonment, a community order, or a conditional discharge, the defendant will be subject to mandatory notification requirements under the Sexual Offences Act 2003, for a period determined by the sentence. The implications for employment, travel, and other aspects of daily life can be long-lasting.

Get in touch

Talk to us today.
No obligation.

Whether you've been arrested, received a police letter, or are currently under investigation — the earlier you speak to us, the more we can do. All enquiries are strictly confidential.

Address Office 6, First Floor, St Thomas House,
18 St Thomas Road, Chorley PR7 1HR
Strictly confidential
No obligation
SRA regulated

Send us a message

We'll respond within 2 hours during business hours


Strictly confidential  ·  SRA regulated  ·  No obligation

What our clients say

5.0
★★★★★
Verified Google Reviews
★★★★★

Amazing guys. Incredibly professional, very helpful in answering all my questions and got the verdict we wanted.

UN
Uwais Nagouda
July 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Thanks to Alex and his team I've managed to keep my driving licence. Complex case, made it straightforward.

IA
Imtiaz Ali
June 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

I've been using Alex for years, always goes above and beyond. Very knowledgeable and very good at what he does.

KA
Kevin Aspinall
Sept 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Exceptional service from start to finish. Alex kept me informed at every stage and achieved a brilliant result.

SB
Sarah Birchall
Oct 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Would not hesitate to recommend. Took the time to explain everything clearly and fought hard for the right outcome.

MH
Mohammed Hussain
Nov 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Incredibly reassuring during an incredibly stressful time. Professional, discreet, and delivered exactly what they promised.

JT
James Turner
Dec 2024 · Google · Verified

Voyeurism and Upskirting FAQ

Does section 67A require that an image was actually taken?
Section 67A(1) — operating equipment — does not require that an image was captured. The intent to view genitals, buttocks, or underwear is sufficient to commit the offence. Section 67A(2) — recording an image — is the alternative charge where an image has been successfully recorded.
What if the image was captured accidentally?
Where an image was captured accidentally — for example, by an automatic camera trigger or an unintended device movement — the specific intent required for the offence may not be established. Digital forensic evidence, including metadata analysis of timing, sequence, and device behaviour, can address whether any deliberate act was involved.
Can a voyeurism or upskirting conviction lead to being on the Sex Offenders Register?
Yes. Where the court imposes a sentence of imprisonment, a community order, or a conditional discharge for either offence, mandatory notification requirements under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 are triggered for a period determined by the sentence received.
What is the maximum sentence for upskirting?
Both the operating equipment offence under section 67A(1) and the recording an image offence under section 67A(2) carry a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment. In practice, many first-time offenders are dealt with by way of community orders or suspended sentences where appropriate mitigation is advanced.
Sexual Offences

Voyeurism & Upskirting

Facing this allegation is serious — and often unexpected. Early specialist advice makes all the difference to the outcome.

Quick Overview
Voyeurism and Upskirting — Key Facts

Voyeurism under section 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and upskirting under section 67A both require the prosecution to establish a specific intent or purpose. Both carry a maximum of two years' imprisonment and can result in placement on the Sex Offenders Register.

  • Voyeurism — Section 67It is an offence intentionally to observe or record another person performing a private act without their consent, where the purpose is sexual gratification.
  • Upskirting — Section 67AOperating equipment or recording images beneath a person's clothing without consent is an offence under the Voyeurism (Offences) Act 2019, regardless of the victim's gender or clothing.
  • The Intent RequirementThe prosecution must prove that the act was done for the purpose of sexual gratification, or to cause humiliation, alarm, or distress. Alternative explanations for the conduct can be relevant to the defence.
  • SentencingBoth offences carry a maximum of two years' imprisonment and can result in placement on the Sex Offenders Register.
  • Device SeizureInvestigations typically involve the seizure of electronic devices for forensic analysis. This period is an important window for early pre-charge engagement.
Full article below ↓

Voyeurism — Section 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003

Under section 67, voyeurism is committed where a person intentionally observes another person doing a private act without their consent, for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification. A private act is one that a person would reasonably expect to carry out in private — being naked, using a toilet, or engaging in sexual activity. The prosecution must establish that the purpose of the observation or recording was sexual gratification. If the act was motivated by curiosity, a mistake, or a different form of malice, the specific sexual offence of voyeurism may not be made out, although other offences may arise depending on the circumstances.

Upskirting — Section 67A and the Two Offences

The Voyeurism (Offences) Act 2019 inserted section 67A into the Sexual Offences Act 2003 to create two specific criminal offences. Section 67A(1) — operating equipment — covers placing or operating equipment beneath another person's clothing with the intent to view genitals, buttocks, or underwear, or to enable another person to view them. The offence is committed even if no image is actually captured — the intent to view is sufficient. Section 67A(2) — recording an image — is charged where an image beneath a person's clothing has been successfully recorded. The law protects privacy regardless of the victim's gender or what they were wearing.

Challenging Intent — The Motive Battleground

Both voyeurism and upskirting require a specific intent or purpose. For voyeurism, the purpose must be sexual gratification. For upskirting, the purpose must be sexual gratification or the causing of humiliation, alarm, or distress. The absence of the required intent is a complete answer to the charge. Allegations in these cases often arise in crowded settings. Where an image was captured accidentally — for example, by an automatic or unintended camera trigger — or where the positioning of a device can be explained by a reason other than the required intent, these alternative explanations can be developed through digital forensic evidence.

Digital Forensics and Pre-Charge Engagement

Investigations routinely involve the seizure of mobile phones and other devices for forensic examination. Data recovered — including image metadata, timing and sequence of captures, and device location at the time — can be examined by independent experts. Material providing context, such as evidence of accidental or automatic image capture, can be significant to the defence. The period during which devices are being forensically examined — which can extend across several months — is the most important window for early legal engagement and representations to the CPS.

Sentencing and the Sex Offenders Register

Both voyeurism and upskirting carry a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment. Where the court imposes a sentence of imprisonment, a community order, or a conditional discharge, the defendant will be subject to mandatory notification requirements under the Sexual Offences Act 2003, for a period determined by the sentence. The implications for employment, travel, and other aspects of daily life can be long-lasting.

"The absence of the required intent — sexual gratification or causing humiliation — is a complete answer to both charges. Digital forensic evidence, including metadata and timing analysis, can establish that an image was captured accidentally."

— Lostock Legal Solicitors
Arrested or under investigation for voyeurism or upskirting?
Intent is the key battleground.

We instruct independent digital forensic experts to examine metadata, timing, and sequence evidence — and submit representations to the CPS addressing the absence of the required intent before any charging decision is made.

Call Now — 0161 383 8855
Or email for a confidential review
Get in touch

Speak to a specialist

Voyeurism and upskirting defence · SRA regulated


🔒 Strictly confidential · 24/7 Response within 2 hours

Common questions

Voyeurism and Upskirting FAQ

Section 67A(1) — operating equipment — does not require that an image was captured. The intent to view genitals, buttocks, or underwear is sufficient to commit the offence. Section 67A(2) — recording an image — is the alternative charge where an image has been successfully recorded.

Where an image was captured accidentally — for example, by an automatic camera trigger or an unintended device movement — the specific intent required for the offence may not be established. Digital forensic evidence, including metadata analysis of timing, sequence, and device behaviour, can address whether any deliberate act was involved.

Yes. Where the court imposes a sentence of imprisonment, a community order, or a conditional discharge for either offence, mandatory notification requirements under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 are triggered for a period determined by the sentence received.

Both the operating equipment offence under section 67A(1) and the recording an image offence under section 67A(2) carry a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment. In practice, many first-time offenders are dealt with by way of community orders or suspended sentences where appropriate mitigation is advanced.