Food Safety Prosecutions

Quick Overview

Food Safety & Hygiene Prosecutions — Key Facts

Food safety law in England is governed by the Food Safety Act 1990, the General Food Regulations 2004, and the Food Hygiene (England) Regulations 2006. Prosecutions are most commonly brought by local authority environmental health officers or the Food Standards Agency and can result in unlimited fines, closure orders, and in serious cases, imprisonment.

  • Strict Liability: Many food safety offences are strict liability — a conviction can occur even where there was no intent to cause harm, provided a breach is established.
  • The Due Diligence Defence: Under section 21 of the Food Safety Act 1990, a business may be acquitted if it can prove it took all reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid the offence.
  • Personal Liability: Under section 20, where an offence is caused by the act or default of a specific individual, that person can be prosecuted alongside or instead of the business.
  • Traceability and Labelling: Businesses involved in the distribution of food products must comply with regulations governing safe importation, traceability, and accurate labelling.
  • Hygiene Standards: The law requires a documented food safety management system based on HACCP principles, staff training, and maintenance of premises cleanliness.

Under investigation?

Facing a charge for Public Order offence

Speak to a specialist criminal defence solicitor immediately. Early legal advice is critical when facing investigation or potential charges.

Speak to a Solicitor Now 0161 383 8855 Get My Free Case Review
"Being investigated does not guarantee a charge. Early intervention is often the difference between a conviction and a dropped case."
Confidential
No obligation
SRA regulated

The Statutory Framework

Food safety law in England is governed by a combination of primary legislation and specific regulations. The principal statutes are the Food Safety Act 1990, the General Food Regulations 2004, and the Food Hygiene (England) Regulations 2006. Prosecutions are most commonly brought by local authority environmental health officers or the Food Standards Agency (FSA), and can result in unlimited fines, closure orders, and in serious cases, imprisonment.

Any business operating within the food sector — from importers and manufacturers to retailers and caterers — is required to comply with these provisions. The obligations apply to both the business entity and, in appropriate cases, to individual managers and employees.

Primary Offences Under the Food Safety Act 1990

Section 7 — Rendering Food Injurious to Health

It is an offence to render food injurious to health with the intent that it be sold for human consumption. This includes adding harmful substances, using unsafe ingredients, or subjecting food to processes — such as inadequate heating or cooling — that make it dangerous.

Section 14 — Selling Food Not of the Nature, Substance or Quality Demanded

This offence is committed where food is sold to a purchaser's prejudice that is not of the nature, substance, or quality demanded. Common examples include substituting ingredients with cheaper alternatives, misdescribing the composition of a product, or selling food containing unexpected contaminants.

Section 15 — Falsely Describing or Presenting Food

It is a criminal offence to falsely describe, advertise, or present food in a way that is misleading as to its nature, substance, or quality. This offence covers both labelling and verbal or promotional representations.

The Due Diligence Defence — Section 21

The due diligence defence under section 21 of the Food Safety Act 1990 is the most important tool available to a food business facing prosecution. To succeed, the business must prove that it took all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of the offence, whether by itself or by a person under its control.

In practice, this requires the business to demonstrate that it had a robust, documented food safety management system in place — typically based on HACCP principles — and that it regularly audited and enforced that system. Training records, temperature logs, supplier audits, and complaint handling records are all relevant to establishing this defence.

Enforcement and Investigation

Investigations are conducted by local authority environmental health officers or the Food Standards Agency. Officers have powers to enter premises, inspect records, take samples, and seize food or equipment. A Hygiene Emergency Prohibition Order can be obtained from a Magistrates' Court where there is an imminent risk to public health, effectively closing the business immediately.

The decision to prosecute is subject to the evidential and public interest tests. Where a business has taken proactive steps to identify and address a problem, representations made to the investigating authority before a prosecution decision is taken can influence whether the matter is resolved by civil sanction rather than criminal charge.

Consequences of Conviction

Conviction under the Food Safety Act 1990 or associated regulations can result in an unlimited fine, a prohibition order preventing the business from operating, and in serious cases a custodial sentence. A conviction may also affect the business's Food Hygiene Rating, which is publicly displayed and directly affects consumer confidence.

What to Do if You Are Under Investigation

If you have been contacted by environmental health officers, have received a notice of intended prosecution, or are facing a Hygiene Emergency Prohibition Order, seek specialist legal advice immediately. Where a breach has occurred, the strength of the due diligence defence will depend on the quality of documentation and records available. Gathering and preserving those records at the earliest opportunity is an important first step.

Get in touch

Talk to us today.
No obligation.

Whether you've been arrested, received a police letter, or are currently under investigation — the earlier you speak to us, the more we can do. All enquiries are strictly confidential.

Address Office 6, First Floor, St Thomas House,
18 St Thomas Road, Chorley PR7 1HR
Strictly confidential
No obligation
SRA regulated

Send us a message

We'll respond within 2 hours during business hours


Strictly confidential  ·  SRA regulated  ·  No obligation

What our clients say

5.0
★★★★★
Verified Google Reviews
★★★★★

Amazing guys. Incredibly professional, very helpful in answering all my questions and got the verdict we wanted.

UN
Uwais Nagouda
July 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Thanks to Alex and his team I've managed to keep my driving licence. Complex case, made it straightforward.

IA
Imtiaz Ali
June 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

I've been using Alex for years, always goes above and beyond. Very knowledgeable and very good at what he does.

KA
Kevin Aspinall
Sept 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Exceptional service from start to finish. Alex kept me informed at every stage and achieved a brilliant result.

SB
Sarah Birchall
Oct 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Would not hesitate to recommend. Took the time to explain everything clearly and fought hard for the right outcome.

MH
Mohammed Hussain
Nov 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Incredibly reassuring during an incredibly stressful time. Professional, discreet, and delivered exactly what they promised.

JT
James Turner
Dec 2024 · Google · Verified

Food Safety FAQ

Can I be convicted even if I did not intend to cause harm?
Yes. Many food safety offences are strict liability, meaning the prosecution does not need to prove intent. If a breach occurred, the offence is made out unless you can establish the due diligence defence.
What records do I need for the due diligence defence?
Training records, temperature monitoring logs, supplier audit records, HACCP documentation, and complaint handling records are all relevant. The defence depends on demonstrating a robust, consistently applied system — not just having documents on file.
What is a Hygiene Emergency Prohibition Order?
It is a court order obtained by environmental health officers that can close your business immediately where there is an imminent risk to public health. Legal advice should be sought as a matter of urgency if one is threatened or served.
Can a manager be prosecuted personally?
Yes. Under section 20 of the Food Safety Act 1990, where an offence is caused by the act or default of a specific individual, that person can be prosecuted alongside or instead of the business itself.
Regulatory

Food Safety Prosecutions

Facing this allegation is serious — and often unexpected. Early specialist advice makes all the difference to the outcome.

Quick Overview
Food Safety & Hygiene Prosecutions — Key Facts

Food safety law in England is governed by the Food Safety Act 1990 and associated regulations. Prosecutions are most commonly brought by local authority environmental health officers or the Food Standards Agency and can result in unlimited fines, closure orders, and in serious cases, imprisonment.

  • Strict LiabilityMany food safety offences are strict liability — a conviction can occur even where there was no intent to cause harm, provided a breach is established.
  • Due Diligence DefenceUnder section 21 of the Food Safety Act 1990, a business may be acquitted if it can prove it took all reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid the offence.
  • Personal LiabilityUnder section 20, where an offence is caused by the act or default of a specific individual, that person can be prosecuted alongside or instead of the business.
  • Traceability & LabellingBusinesses must comply with regulations governing safe importation, traceability, and accurate labelling.
  • Hygiene StandardsThe law requires a documented food safety management system based on HACCP principles, staff training, and maintenance of premises cleanliness.
Full article below ↓

Primary Offences Under the Food Safety Act 1990

Section 7 — Rendering Food Injurious to Health: It is an offence to render food injurious to health with the intent that it be sold for human consumption. This includes adding harmful substances or subjecting food to processes that make it dangerous.

Section 14 — Selling Food Not of the Nature, Substance or Quality Demanded: This offence is committed where food is sold to a purchaser's prejudice that is not of the nature, substance, or quality demanded. Common examples include substituting ingredients or selling food containing unexpected contaminants.

Section 15 — Falsely Describing or Presenting Food: It is a criminal offence to falsely describe, advertise, or present food in a way that is misleading as to its nature, substance, or quality.

The Due Diligence Defence — Section 21

The due diligence defence is the most important tool available to a food business facing prosecution. The business must prove that it took all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of the offence.

In practice, this requires a robust, documented food safety management system based on HACCP principles. Training records, temperature logs, supplier audits, and complaint handling records are all relevant to establishing this defence.

"The strength of the due diligence defence depends entirely on the quality of your documentation. Gathering and preserving those records at the earliest opportunity is critical."

— Lostock Legal Solicitors
Contacted by environmental health?
Get advice before you respond.

Where a breach has occurred, representations made before a prosecution decision is taken can influence whether the matter is resolved by civil sanction rather than criminal charge.

Call Now — 0161 383 8855
Or email for a confidential review

Consequences of Conviction

Conviction can result in an unlimited fine, a prohibition order preventing the business from operating, and in serious cases a custodial sentence. A conviction may also affect the business's Food Hygiene Rating, which is publicly displayed and directly affects consumer confidence.

What to Do if You Are Under Investigation

If you have been contacted by environmental health officers, received a notice of intended prosecution, or are facing a Hygiene Emergency Prohibition Order, seek specialist legal advice immediately. Gathering and preserving documentation records at the earliest opportunity is an important first step.

Get in touch

Speak to a specialist

Food safety defence · SRA regulated


🔒 Strictly confidential · 24/7 Response within 2 hours

Common questions

Food Safety FAQ

Yes. Many food safety offences are strict liability, meaning the prosecution does not need to prove intent. If a breach occurred, the offence is made out unless you can establish the due diligence defence.

Training records, temperature monitoring logs, supplier audit records, HACCP documentation, and complaint handling records are all relevant. The defence depends on demonstrating a robust, consistently applied system.

It is a court order obtained by environmental health officers that can close your business immediately where there is an imminent risk to public health. Legal advice should be sought as a matter of urgency if one is threatened or served.

Yes. Under section 20 of the Food Safety Act 1990, where an offence is caused by the act or default of a specific individual, that person can be prosecuted alongside or instead of the business itself.