Economic Crime & Corporate Transparency

Quick Overview

Economic Crime & Corporate Transparency — Key Facts

The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 is the most significant reform to corporate criminal liability in decades. It sits alongside the Criminal Finances Act 2017 to create a substantially more demanding compliance environment for UK businesses.

  • The Senior Manager Test: Corporations are directly liable for economic crimes committed by senior managers acting within the scope of their authority.
  • Failure to Prevent Fraud: Large organisations face strict liability where an employee commits fraud for the company's benefit, unless reasonable fraud prevention procedures were in place.
  • Companies House Powers: The Registrar of Companies House can verify identities, cross-check data, and share suspicious filings with law enforcement.
  • Crypto Seizure: Investigators have enhanced powers to freeze and forfeit digital assets without securing a criminal conviction.
  • Digital Assets as Property: The Property (Digital Assets etc.) Act 2025 confirmed that digital assets are personal property in UK law, enabling civil recovery and proprietary injunctions.

Under investigation?

For Economic Crime & Corporate Transparency

Speak to a specialist criminal defence solicitor immediately. Early legal advice is critical when facing investigation or potential charges.

Speak to a Solicitor Now 0161 383 8855 Get My Free Case Review
"Being investigated does not guarantee a charge. Early intervention is often the difference between a conviction and a dropped case."
Confidential
No obligation
SRA regulated

Liability for Senior Managers — The New Identification Doctrine

Prior to the ECCTA, prosecuting large UK companies was difficult because the law required proof that the directing mind and will of the company was involved in the offence. The ECCTA removed this requirement for economic crimes. Where a senior manager commits a relevant offence — including fraud, bribery, or money laundering — while acting within the actual or apparent scope of their authority, the corporation is also guilty. Mid-level management conduct can now give rise to direct corporate criminal liability.

The Failure to Prevent Fraud Offence

Modelled on section 7 of the Bribery Act, this offence holds large organisations strictly liable where an associated person commits a fraud offence intending to benefit the organisation. The prosecution does not need to prove the directors knew about the fraud. The only defence is to demonstrate that reasonable fraud prevention procedures were in place at the time. The offence generally applies to organisations with more than 250 employees, turnover exceeding £36 million, or assets exceeding £18 million.

Companies House — From Registrar to Regulator

The Act has transformed Companies House from a passive repository into an active investigative body. All new and existing company directors and Persons with Significant Control must verify their identity. The Registrar has the power to share information with law enforcement where anomalous filings or suspicious patterns are identified, and can challenge and reject information that appears suspicious or fraudulent.

Crypto-Assets and Digital Property

The ECCTA provides investigators with significantly enhanced powers to freeze and recover crypto-assets associated with illicit activity. The Property (Digital Assets etc.) Act 2025 confirmed that digital assets are personal property, enabling civil recovery under POCA 2002. This means the state can forfeit cryptocurrency even without securing a criminal conviction. Challenging forfeiture applications requires forensic blockchain tracing.

What to Do if Your Business is Under Investigation

If your company is the subject of an investigation by the SFO, NCA, or another enforcement body, seek specialist legal advice immediately. Early engagement allows representations to be made before any charging decision, and where appropriate, can pave the way for a Deferred Prosecution Agreement as an alternative to criminal conviction.

Get in touch

Talk to us today.
No obligation.

Whether you've been arrested, received a police letter, or are currently under investigation — the earlier you speak to us, the more we can do. All enquiries are strictly confidential.

Address Office 6, First Floor, St Thomas House,
18 St Thomas Road, Chorley PR7 1HR
Strictly confidential
No obligation
SRA regulated

Send us a message

We'll respond within 2 hours during business hours


Strictly confidential  ·  SRA regulated  ·  No obligation

What our clients say

5.0
★★★★★
Verified Google Reviews
★★★★★

Amazing guys. Incredibly professional, very helpful in answering all my questions and got the verdict we wanted.

UN
Uwais Nagouda
July 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Thanks to Alex and his team I've managed to keep my driving licence. Complex case, made it straightforward.

IA
Imtiaz Ali
June 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

I've been using Alex for years, always goes above and beyond. Very knowledgeable and very good at what he does.

KA
Kevin Aspinall
Sept 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Exceptional service from start to finish. Alex kept me informed at every stage and achieved a brilliant result.

SB
Sarah Birchall
Oct 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Would not hesitate to recommend. Took the time to explain everything clearly and fought hard for the right outcome.

MH
Mohammed Hussain
Nov 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Incredibly reassuring during an incredibly stressful time. Professional, discreet, and delivered exactly what they promised.

JT
James Turner
Dec 2024 · Google · Verified

ECCTA 2023 FAQ

What is the failure to prevent fraud offence?
It is a strict liability offence under the ECCTA 2023 that holds large organisations criminally liable where an associated person commits fraud intending to benefit the organisation — even if the board had no knowledge. The only defence is to demonstrate reasonable fraud prevention procedures were in place at the time.
Which organisations does the failure to prevent fraud offence apply to?
It generally applies to large organisations — those with more than 250 employees, turnover exceeding £36 million, or assets exceeding £18 million. Smaller organisations may still face liability under other provisions.
What has changed under the new identification doctrine?
Previously, prosecuting a large company required proving the directing mind and will — effectively the board — was involved in the offence. The ECCTA removed this for economic crimes. Where a senior manager commits a relevant offence within the scope of their authority, the company is also guilty — meaning mid-level management conduct can now give rise to direct corporate liability.
What are Companies House's new powers?
The ECCTA transformed Companies House into an active investigative body. It can verify director identities, challenge suspicious filings, and share information with law enforcement bodies including the SFO and HMRC. All directors and Persons with Significant Control must now verify their identity.
Fraud

Economic Crime

Facing this allegation is serious — and often unexpected. Early specialist advice makes all the difference to the outcome.

Quick Overview
Economic Crime & Corporate Transparency — Key Facts

The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 is the most significant reform to corporate criminal liability in decades. It sits alongside the Criminal Finances Act 2017 to create a substantially more demanding compliance environment for UK businesses.

  • The Senior Manager TestCorporations are directly liable for economic crimes committed by senior managers acting within the scope of their authority.
  • Failure to Prevent FraudLarge organisations face strict liability where an employee commits fraud for the company's benefit, unless reasonable fraud prevention procedures were in place.
  • Companies House PowersThe Registrar of Companies House can verify identities, cross-check data, and share suspicious filings with law enforcement.
  • Crypto SeizureInvestigators have enhanced powers to freeze and forfeit digital assets without securing a criminal conviction.
  • Digital Assets as PropertyThe Property (Digital Assets etc.) Act 2025 confirmed that digital assets are personal property in UK law, enabling civil recovery and proprietary injunctions.
Full article below ↓

Liability for Senior Managers — The New Identification Doctrine

Prior to the ECCTA, prosecuting large UK companies was difficult because the law required proof that the directing mind and will of the company was involved in the offence. The ECCTA removed this requirement for economic crimes. Where a senior manager commits a relevant offence — including fraud, bribery, or money laundering — while acting within the actual or apparent scope of their authority, the corporation is also guilty. Mid-level management conduct can now give rise to direct corporate criminal liability.

The Failure to Prevent Fraud Offence

Modelled on section 7 of the Bribery Act, this offence holds large organisations strictly liable where an associated person commits a fraud offence intending to benefit the organisation. The prosecution does not need to prove the directors knew about the fraud. The only defence is to demonstrate that reasonable fraud prevention procedures were in place at the time. The offence generally applies to organisations with more than 250 employees, turnover exceeding £36 million, or assets exceeding £18 million.

Companies House — From Registrar to Regulator

The Act has transformed Companies House from a passive repository into an active investigative body. All new and existing company directors and Persons with Significant Control must verify their identity. The Registrar has the power to share information with law enforcement where anomalous filings or suspicious patterns are identified, and can challenge and reject information that appears suspicious or fraudulent.

Crypto-Assets and Digital Property

The ECCTA provides investigators with significantly enhanced powers to freeze and recover crypto-assets associated with illicit activity. The Property (Digital Assets etc.) Act 2025 confirmed that digital assets are personal property, enabling civil recovery under POCA 2002. This means the state can forfeit cryptocurrency even without securing a criminal conviction. Challenging forfeiture applications requires forensic blockchain tracing.

What to Do if Your Business is Under Investigation

If your company is the subject of an investigation by the SFO, NCA, or another enforcement body, seek specialist legal advice immediately. Early engagement allows representations to be made before any charging decision, and where appropriate, can pave the way for a Deferred Prosecution Agreement as an alternative to criminal conviction.

"An organisation that cannot demonstrate reasonable fraud prevention procedures at the time a fraud was committed will have no defence — regardless of whether the board had any knowledge of the wrongdoing."

— Lostock Legal Solicitors
Business under investigation?
Act before it escalates.

Early engagement allows representations before any charging decision. Where appropriate, it can pave the way for a Deferred Prosecution Agreement rather than criminal conviction.

Call Now — 0161 383 8855
Or email for a confidential review
Get in touch

Speak to a specialist

Corporate crime defence · SRA regulated


🔒 Strictly confidential · 24/7 Response within 2 hours

Common questions

ECCTA 2023 FAQ

It is a strict liability offence under the ECCTA 2023 that holds large organisations criminally liable where an associated person commits fraud intending to benefit the organisation — even if the board had no knowledge. The only defence is to demonstrate reasonable fraud prevention procedures were in place at the time.

It generally applies to large organisations — those with more than 250 employees, turnover exceeding £36 million, or assets exceeding £18 million. Smaller organisations may still face liability under other provisions.

Previously, prosecuting a large company required proving the directing mind and will — effectively the board — was involved in the offence. The ECCTA removed this for economic crimes. Where a senior manager commits a relevant offence within the scope of their authority, the company is also guilty — meaning mid-level management conduct can now give rise to direct corporate liability.

The ECCTA transformed Companies House into an active investigative body. It can verify director identities, challenge suspicious filings, and share information with law enforcement bodies including the SFO and HMRC. All directors and Persons with Significant Control must now verify their identity.