Furlough Fraud Investigations

Quick Overview

Furlough Fraud Investigations — Key Facts

HMRC has made investigation of fraudulent or erroneous CJRS claims a priority for its Fraud Investigation Service. Cases involving deliberate abuse are treated as criminal matters and can result in unannounced dawn raids, interviews under caution, and bank account restraint orders.

  • The 20-Year Window: HMRC can investigate deliberate tax and grant inaccuracies for up to 20 years. Furlough fraud is treated as a form of tax fraud.
  • Common Triggers: Whistleblowers, data-matching between CJRS claims and PAYE records, and anomalies in company accounts are the most frequent triggers for investigation.
  • Criminal Charges: Serious abuse can lead to charges of Cheating the Public Revenue, Fraud by False Representation, or Money Laundering.
  • Repayment vs Prosecution: HMRC often allows civil repayment with penalties for genuine errors, but will prosecute deliberate abuse such as ghost employees or coerced working.
  • Voluntary Disclosure: Early voluntary disclosure is the most effective way to reduce financial penalties and avoid prosecution in appropriate cases.

Under investigation?

Furlough Fraud Investigations

Speak to a specialist criminal defence solicitor immediately. Early legal advice is critical when facing investigation or potential charges.

Speak to a Solicitor Now 0161 383 8855 Get My Free Case Review
"Being investigated does not guarantee a charge. Early intervention is often the difference between a conviction and a dropped case."
Confidential
No obligation
SRA regulated

Common Allegations of Furlough Abuse

HMRC categorises furlough error and fraud according to the level of intent, which determines whether it pursues a civil or criminal resolution. Common allegations include: working while furloughed (asking or coercing staff to continue working while claiming their wages from the state); ghost employees (claiming for individuals never employed or who had left before the scheme began); inflated claims (deliberately overstating salary or hours to increase the grant); and non-payment to staff (receiving the grant but failing to pass the full amount to employees).

The 20-Year Investigation Window

Standard HMRC enquiries are subject to relatively short limitation periods. However, where HMRC suspects deliberate inaccuracy, it can investigate tax and grant matters going back up to 20 years. Furlough fraud is categorised as a form of tax fraud, meaning the extended window applies even to claims made during the initial period of the scheme.

Innocent Mistakes and the Reasonable Excuse Defence

The CJRS rules changed frequently and were not always straightforward to apply. HMRC acknowledges that some inaccurate claims resulted from genuine error. Where a business can demonstrate that it took reasonable care or had a reasonable excuse for any inaccuracy, it may be possible to negotiate a civil settlement. Early voluntary disclosure, before HMRC commences a formal enquiry, is treated more favourably than disclosure made after an investigation has begun.

Criminal Charges

Where HMRC concludes that abuse was deliberate, it will refer the matter to its criminal investigation teams. Potential charges include Cheating the Public Revenue, Fraud by False Representation under the Fraud Act 2006, and Money Laundering under POCA 2002. Convictions in this area have led to custodial sentences, director disqualification, and confiscation orders.

What to Do if You Are Under Investigation

If you have received a CJRS compliance enquiry, been asked to attend a voluntary interview, or are under criminal investigation in connection with furlough claims, seek specialist legal advice immediately. Do not speak to HMRC investigators without a solicitor present. An early review of your furlough records — before HMRC completes its own analysis — allows any vulnerabilities to be identified and addressed proactively.

Get in touch

Talk to us today.
No obligation.

Whether you've been arrested, received a police letter, or are currently under investigation — the earlier you speak to us, the more we can do. All enquiries are strictly confidential.

Address Office 6, First Floor, St Thomas House,
18 St Thomas Road, Chorley PR7 1HR
Strictly confidential
No obligation
SRA regulated

Send us a message

We'll respond within 2 hours during business hours


Strictly confidential  ·  SRA regulated  ·  No obligation

What our clients say

5.0
★★★★★
Verified Google Reviews
★★★★★

Amazing guys. Incredibly professional, very helpful in answering all my questions and got the verdict we wanted.

UN
Uwais Nagouda
July 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Thanks to Alex and his team I've managed to keep my driving licence. Complex case, made it straightforward.

IA
Imtiaz Ali
June 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

I've been using Alex for years, always goes above and beyond. Very knowledgeable and very good at what he does.

KA
Kevin Aspinall
Sept 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Exceptional service from start to finish. Alex kept me informed at every stage and achieved a brilliant result.

SB
Sarah Birchall
Oct 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Would not hesitate to recommend. Took the time to explain everything clearly and fought hard for the right outcome.

MH
Mohammed Hussain
Nov 2024 · Google · Verified
★★★★★

Incredibly reassuring during an incredibly stressful time. Professional, discreet, and delivered exactly what they promised.

JT
James Turner
Dec 2024 · Google · Verified

Furlough Fraud FAQ

What is the difference between a furlough error and furlough fraud?
HMRC distinguishes between genuine errors (where a business made an honest mistake applying complex and frequently changing rules) and deliberate abuse (where claims were made knowing they were inaccurate). Genuine errors can typically be resolved through civil repayment and penalties. Deliberate abuse is referred to HMRC's criminal investigation teams.
How far back can HMRC investigate my furlough claims?
Where HMRC suspects deliberate inaccuracy, it can investigate up to 20 years back. Furlough fraud is categorised as tax fraud for these purposes. Standard enquiry windows are much shorter, but the extended 20-year window applies to deliberate conduct.
Should I make a voluntary disclosure to HMRC?
In appropriate cases, yes. Early voluntary disclosure is treated more favourably by HMRC than disclosure made after an investigation has already commenced. However, the decision to disclose — and the terms on which it is done — requires careful specialist advice to avoid inadvertently worsening your position.
What charges can follow a furlough fraud investigation?
Potential charges include Cheating the Public Revenue (which now carries a maximum of 14 years following the Finance Act 2024), Fraud by False Representation under the Fraud Act 2006, and Money Laundering under POCA 2002. Convictions have led to custodial sentences, director disqualification, and confiscation orders.
Fraud

Furlough Fraud Investigations

Facing this allegation is serious — and often unexpected. Early specialist advice makes all the difference to the outcome.

Quick Overview
Furlough Fraud Investigations — Key Facts

HMRC has made investigation of fraudulent or erroneous CJRS claims a priority for its Fraud Investigation Service. Cases involving deliberate abuse are treated as criminal matters and can result in unannounced dawn raids, interviews under caution, and bank account restraint orders.

  • The 20-Year WindowHMRC can investigate deliberate tax and grant inaccuracies for up to 20 years. Furlough fraud is treated as a form of tax fraud.
  • Common TriggersWhistleblowers, data-matching between CJRS claims and PAYE records, and anomalies in company accounts are the most frequent triggers for investigation.
  • Criminal ChargesSerious abuse can lead to charges of Cheating the Public Revenue, Fraud by False Representation, or Money Laundering.
  • Repayment vs ProsecutionHMRC often allows civil repayment with penalties for genuine errors, but will prosecute deliberate abuse such as ghost employees or coerced working.
  • Voluntary DisclosureEarly voluntary disclosure is the most effective way to reduce financial penalties and avoid prosecution in appropriate cases.
Full article below ↓

Common Allegations of Furlough Abuse

HMRC categorises furlough error and fraud according to the level of intent, which determines whether it pursues a civil or criminal resolution. Common allegations include: working while furloughed (asking or coercing staff to continue working while claiming their wages from the state); ghost employees (claiming for individuals never employed or who had left before the scheme began); inflated claims (deliberately overstating salary or hours to increase the grant); and non-payment to staff (receiving the grant but failing to pass the full amount to employees).

The 20-Year Investigation Window

Standard HMRC enquiries are subject to relatively short limitation periods. However, where HMRC suspects deliberate inaccuracy, it can investigate tax and grant matters going back up to 20 years. Furlough fraud is categorised as a form of tax fraud, meaning the extended window applies even to claims made during the initial period of the scheme.

Innocent Mistakes and the Reasonable Excuse Defence

The CJRS rules changed frequently and were not always straightforward to apply. HMRC acknowledges that some inaccurate claims resulted from genuine error. Where a business can demonstrate that it took reasonable care or had a reasonable excuse for any inaccuracy, it may be possible to negotiate a civil settlement. Early voluntary disclosure, before HMRC commences a formal enquiry, is treated more favourably than disclosure made after an investigation has begun.

Criminal Charges

Where HMRC concludes that abuse was deliberate, it will refer the matter to its criminal investigation teams. Potential charges include Cheating the Public Revenue, Fraud by False Representation under the Fraud Act 2006, and Money Laundering under POCA 2002. Convictions in this area have led to custodial sentences, director disqualification, and confiscation orders.

What to Do if You Are Under Investigation

If you have received a CJRS compliance enquiry, been asked to attend a voluntary interview, or are under criminal investigation in connection with furlough claims, seek specialist legal advice immediately. Do not speak to HMRC investigators without a solicitor present. An early review of your furlough records — before HMRC completes its own analysis — allows any vulnerabilities to be identified and addressed proactively.

"Early voluntary disclosure — before HMRC commences a formal enquiry — is treated more favourably than disclosure made after an investigation has begun."

— Lostock Legal Solicitors
Received a CJRS compliance enquiry?
Do not respond without legal advice.

An early review of your furlough records — before HMRC completes its own analysis — allows any vulnerabilities to be identified and addressed proactively, which can significantly affect the outcome.

Call Now — 0161 383 8855
Or email for a confidential review
Get in touch

Speak to a specialist

Furlough fraud defence · SRA regulated


🔒 Strictly confidential · 24/7 Response within 2 hours

Common questions

Furlough Fraud FAQ

HMRC distinguishes between genuine errors (where a business made an honest mistake applying complex and frequently changing rules) and deliberate abuse (where claims were made knowing they were inaccurate). Genuine errors can typically be resolved through civil repayment and penalties. Deliberate abuse is referred to HMRC's criminal investigation teams.

Where HMRC suspects deliberate inaccuracy, it can investigate up to 20 years back. Furlough fraud is categorised as tax fraud for these purposes. Standard enquiry windows are much shorter, but the extended 20-year window applies to deliberate conduct.

In appropriate cases, yes. Early voluntary disclosure is treated more favourably by HMRC than disclosure made after an investigation has already commenced. However, the decision to disclose — and the terms on which it is done — requires careful specialist advice to avoid inadvertently worsening your position.

Potential charges include Cheating the Public Revenue (which now carries a maximum of 14 years following the Finance Act 2024), Fraud by False Representation under the Fraud Act 2006, and Money Laundering under POCA 2002. Convictions have led to custodial sentences, director disqualification, and confiscation orders.